$\overlineΣ^{\pm}$ production in pp and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV with ALICE

The transverse momentum spectra and integrated yields of $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ have been measured in pp and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ALICE experiment. Measurements are performed via the newly accessed decay channel $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm} \rightarrow {\rm\overline{n}}\pi^{\pm}$. A new method of antineutron reconstruction with the PHOS electromagnetic spectrometer is developed and applied to this analysis. The $p_{\rm T}$ spectra of $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ are measured in the range $0.5 <~ p_{\rm T} <~ 3$ GeV/$c$ and compared to predictions of the PYTHIA 8, DPMJET, PHOJET, EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models. The EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models provide the best descriptions of the measured spectra both in pp and p-Pb collisions, while models which do not account for multiparton interactions provide a considerably worse description at high $p_{\rm T}$. The total yields of $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ in both pp and p-Pb collisions are compared to predictions of the Thermal-FIST model and dynamical models PYTHIA 8, DPMJET, PHOJET, EPOS LHC and EPOS4. All models reproduce the total yields in both colliding systems within uncertainties. The nuclear modification factors $R_{\rm pPb}$ for both $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ and $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ are evaluated and compared to those of protons, $\Lambda$ and $\Xi$ hyperons, and predictions of EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models. No deviations of $R_{\rm pPb}$ for $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ from the model predictions or measurements for other hadrons are found within uncertainties.

 

Submitted to: EPJC
e-Print: arXiv:2507.13183 | PDF | inSPIRE
CERN-EP-2025-151
Figure group

Figure 1

Shower shape parameters $M_{02}$ vs. $M_{20}$ for $\gamma$ (left) and ${\rm \overline{n}}$ (right) simulated in p--Pb collisions simulated with the DPMJET 3.0-5 [24] event generator.

Figure 2

Fraction of different types of particles which produce clusters in PHOS before (left) and after the application of a default set of selections (right) as a function of cluster energy in p$-$Pb collisions simulated with the DPMJET 3.0-5 event generator.

Figure 3

Decay topology of the $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm} \to {\rm \overline{n}} \pi^\pm$ decay. In the reconstruction procedure, the direction of the ${\rm \overline{n}}$ momentum is approximated by the vector pointing from the the PV to the cluster in the PHOS.

Figure 4

Same event, mixed event, signal from data, and MC true signal invariant mass distributions of ${\rm \overline{n}}\pi^+$ pairs in pp (left) and p$-$Pb (right) collisions for one selected $p_{\rm{T}}$ bin. Solid and dashed vertical lines represent integration ranges at 1/4 and 1/3 of the maximum, respectively. The PYTHIA 8 [29] and DPMJET 3.0-5 [30] event generators were used for Monte-Carlo simulations.

Figure 5

Comparison of peak position (left column) and full width at half maximum, FWHM, (right column) in pp (top row) and p$-$Pb collisions (bottom row) in data and MC simulations. The PYTHIA 8 [29] and DPMJET 3.0-5 [24] event generators were used for Monte-Carlo simulations. The PDG mass values of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ and $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ [11] are shown with short and long dashed lines, respectively.

Figure 6

Reconstruction efficiency for $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ in pp collisions calculated using PYTHIA 8 [29] (left) and $\overline{\Sigma}^{\pm}$ in p$-$Pb collisions (right) calculated using DPMJET 3.0-5 [24].

Figure 7

Spectra of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ (left column) and $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ (right column) measured in pp (top row) and p$-$Pb (bottom row) collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV compared to predictions of EPOS LHC and EPOS4 [37,38], PYTHIA 8 [29], PHOJET and DPMJET [39] models. Also, Lévy-Tsallis fits to the measured spectra are shown.

Figure 8

Ratio of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ to $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ spectra in pp and p$-$Pb collisions compared to predictions of EPOS LHC and EPOS4 [37,38], PYTHIA 8 [29], PHOJET and DPMJET [39] models.

Figure 9

$p_{\rm{T}}$-differential ratios of $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$, $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$, $\Lambda$ and protons to pions, protons, and $\Lambda$ (in the case of p$-$Pb collisions) in pp (top row) and p$-$Pb (middle and bottom rows) collisions. In the ratios for p$-$Pb collisions, spectra in the denominator are taken in the rapidity range $-0.5$ < $y_{\rm{CMS}}$ < $0$. Ratios are compared to predictions of EPOS4 [38], DPMJET [39] and PYTHIA 8 [29] models.

Figure 10

Comparison of ratios of integrated yields of different particle species as shown in Tab.3 ($\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ and $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ yields are combined). Ratios are compared to predictions of EPOS LHC and EPOS4 [37,38], PHOJET and DPMJET [39], PYTHIA 8 [29], and Thermal-FIST [43] models.

Figure 11

Nuclear modification factors $R_{\rm{pPb}}$ measured for $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ and $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ compared to those of protons [45] and $\Xi$ [45,46] (left) and to predictions of EPOS4 and EPOS LHC models [37] (right).